Invention

Computer System For Performing Reusable Software Application Development From A Set Of Declarative Executable Specifications

Granted as US7039898. 1 filing on record with the USPTO.

Status: Expired
Priority application: 10194646
Earliest filing: Jul 12, 2002
Assignee of record
Inventors: Shahid N. Shah
Last USPTO event: May 28, 2018

Abstract

A computer system executing a method for performing reusable software application development comprises integrating a data processing system, providing a set of keywords and attributes, and declaring a set of executable specifications using the keywords and attributes, further comprising generating a program code, instantiating an object code, generating a testable functionality result, generating at least one unit test, generating an implementation documentation output, generating a performance statistics output, and generating a project metrics in the data processing system. The step of providing a set of keywords and attributes comprises generating a set of user interface forms, fields, and validation rules, generating a library of structured query language statements, generating a library of rules for generating dynamic structured query language statements, generating one of a web browser report, a file-based report, and a portable document format report, generating a library of security rules and permission statements, and generating database schemata.

As published in US7039898.

First claim

1. A computer system for performing reusable software application development, said computer system comprising a multi-component architecture comprising data, wherein said multi-component architecture further comprises: a relational database server operatively connected to an application server;

The claim as granted. The full claim set is in the patent document.

Drawings

The 11 sheets filed with US7039898. Each opens full size.

Sheet 1 of 11
Sheet 2 of 11
Sheet 3 of 11
Sheet 4 of 11
Sheet 5 of 11
Sheet 6 of 11
Sheet 7 of 11
Sheet 8 of 11
Sheet 9 of 11
Sheet 10 of 11
Sheet 11 of 11

Read US7039898 in full (PDF)

Filings in this family

Listed oldest first. Each line links to the canonical USPTO record, so the status here can be checked against the source in one click.

US7039898

Application 10194646

Computer System For Performing Reusable Software Application Development From A Set Of Declarative Executable Specifications

Filed: Jul 12, 2002
Published: Jan 15, 2004
Granted: May 2, 2006
USPTO status: Patent Expired Due to NonPayment of Maintenance Fees Under 37 CFR 1.362 (May 28, 2018)
Examiner: STEELMAN, MARY J, art unit 2191

Read the patent Official PDF Application file (USPTO sign-in)

Classifications

G06F 11/3604 · G06F 11/3676 · G06F 11/3684

Put this to work

Patent relevance screen

Record where this family may touch a product, workflow, or market before a licensing or counsel review.

For: Practitioners, researchers, founders, and operating leaders.
What you keep: A patent relevance record you can review, revise, and send.
What counts as sound: Answers a named decision
Separates evidence from assumptions
Includes the strongest contrary case
Names missing evidence
Ends with a test, owner, and date

This screen is educational. It is not legal advice, a freedom-to-operate opinion, or a claim chart.

Nothing entered here is stored or sent. Review the prompt before sharing confidential, personal, patient, or privileged information.

The caseName the organization, setting, product, or piece of work without including confidential information.The decisionWhat must someone decide, and who owns that decision?Evidence in handList records, observations, measurements, rights, or prior work that can be checked.What is still unknownName missing evidence, disputed assumptions, and practical constraints.

Review the prompt

Patent relevance screen 1.0

PURPOSE
Record where this family may touch a product, workflow, or market before a licensing or counsel review.

CONTEXT
The case: Not provided
The decision: Not provided
Evidence in hand: Not provided
What is still unknown: Not provided

METHOD
1. Name the product and market.
2. Describe the relevant function in plain language.
3. Compare it with the published claims.
4. List supporting and contrary evidence.
5. Choose counsel review, technical review, licensing discussion, or stop.

TASK
Use the method below to produce a Patent relevance record.

RULES
Separate facts, inferences, assumptions, estimates, hypotheses, and unknowns. Do not invent evidence, performance, rights, customers, economics, or regulatory standing. Quote or link the source for material facts. State uncertainty. Name what would disprove the conclusion. End with the smallest credible test, an owner, a decision date, and a stop condition.

A SOUND ANSWER
- Answers a named decision
- Separates evidence from assumptions
- Includes the strongest contrary case
- Names missing evidence
- Ends with a test, owner, and date

CAUTION
This screen is educational. It is not legal advice, a freedom-to-operate opinion, or a claim chart.

You can leave any field blank. The prompt will mark it as not provided.

If the record survives your review, send the question, evidence, unknowns, and requested next step.

Ask about this family Intellectual Frontiers on LinkedIn

For claims, file histories, or license terms on this invention, write to hello+patents@intellectualfrontiers.com.

Back to patent register